The financial institution first contends that demonstration legal erred within the granting conclusion wisdom in plaintiffs’ like for three causes
Lakeview Faith & Deals Financial v
We along with note that the lending company complains your trial legal entered summary judgment from the nonownership of your own package just before deciding plaintiffs’ demand for the newest lot. We see neither prejudice neither error throughout the trial court’s decision to help you go-ahead in this way. The latest i was reading this trial court merely simplistic and you may outlined the issues attending happen on evidentiary reading.
Very first, the bank contends you to definitely plaintiffs haven’t shown which they keep title on the package. Next, for the an associated conflict, the bank contends that plaintiffs haven’t shown which they hold identity a lot better than new bank’s. 3rd, the lending company requires problem with the new trial court’s commitment that the railroad abandoned the right-of-way. To help you manage it desire, we should instead target about three main things: (1) just what attract, if any, plaintiffs keep into the package, (2) what appeal, if any, the bank holds, and you may (3) if people question of thing facts is present regarding whether the railroad given up suitable-of-means.